Maximal ideal
A maximal element in the
partially ordered set
of proper ideals of a corresponding algebraic structure. Maximal
ideals play an essential role in ring theory. Every
ring with identity
has maximal left (also right and two-sided) ideals. The
quotient module
of
regarded as a left (respectively, right)
-module
relative to a left (respectively, right) maximal ideal
is irreducible (cf.
Irreducible module);
a homomorphism
of
into the
field of endomorphisms
of
is a representation of
.
The kernel of all such representations, that is, the set of elements
of the ring which are mapped to zero by all representations, is called the
Jacobson radical
of
;
it coincides with the intersection of all maximal left (also, all right) ideals.
In the ring
of continuous real-valued functions on a closed interval
,
the set of functions vanishing at some fixed point
is a maximal ideal. Such ideals exhaust all maximal ideals of
.
This relation between the points of the interval and the maximal
ideals has resulted in the construction of various theories
for representing rings as rings of functions on a
topological space.
The
Zariski topology
on the set of prime ideals (cf.
Prime ideal)
of a ring
has weak separation properties (that is, there are non-closed points).
A similar topology in the non-commutative case can be introduced on the set
of primitive ideals (cf.
Primitive ideal),
which are the annihilators of
irreducible
-modules.
The set of maximal ideals, and in the
non-commutative case, of maximal primitive ideals, forms a subspace
which satisfies the
-separation axiom.
References| [1] |
N. Jacobson,
"Structure of rings"
, Amer. Math. Soc.
(1956) |
V.E. Govorov
CommentsMaximal ideals also play an important role in the
structure and representation theory of lattices
(particularly distributive lattices). In a
distributive lattice,
as in a commutative ring, all maximal ideals
are prime; the converse implication holds in a
Boolean algebra,
and indeed a distributive lattice in which all prime ideals
are maximal is necessarily Boolean. As with rings, the set
of maximal ideals of a distributive lattice
can be topologized as a subspace of the space
of all prime ideals, and it is a compact
-space;
moreover, every compact
-space
arises in this way. A distributive lattice
is said to be
normal
if, given elements
with
,
there exist
with
and
.
Normal distributive lattices can be characterized as those for which
every prime ideal is contained in a unique maximal ideal,
or equivalently as those for which there is a continuous
retraction
of
onto
;
they have the property that
is a Hausdorff space. For a topological space
,
the lattice
of open subsets of
is normal if and only if
is a
normal space;
if
is a
-space,
then
yields a
compactification
of
,
which coincides with the
Stone–Čech compactification
if
is normal (see
Wallman compactification).
The construction of maximal ideals in arbitrary rings or
lattices generally requires an appeal to Zorn's lemma (see
Axiom of choice
or
Zorn lemma),
and indeed the
maximal ideal theorem
for many classes of rings or lattices (i.e. the assertion that every non-trivial
ring or lattice in the class has a maximal ideal) has been shown to be equivalent in
set theory to the axiom of choice. This applies to the class
of all (commutative) unique factorization domains, and of all Heyting algebras (see
Brouwer lattice);
however, for the classes of principal ideal domains, of Brouwer lattices,
and of normal distributive lattices, the maximal ideal theorem
is equivalent to the
"prime ideal theorem"
for the
corresponding class, and is strictly weaker than the axiom of choice.
References| [a1] |
P.T. Johnstone,
"Stone spaces"
, Cambridge Univ. Press
(1983) |
In the theory of semi-groups (cf.
Semi-group)
maximal ideals play a lesser role than minimal ideals (cf.
Minimal ideal).
If
is a maximal two-sided ideal of a semi-group
,
then either
,
where
is some
indecomposable element
of
(that is,
),
or
is a
prime ideal
(that is, for any two ideals
and
,
implies
or
).
This implies that every maximal two-sided ideal in
is prime if and only if
.
In a semi-group
with a maximal two-sided ideal a prime ideal
is maximal if (and, obviously, only if)
contains the intersection
of all maximal two-sided ideals of
.
The Rees quotient semi-group
is an
-direct union
of semi-groups each of which is either
-simple
or two-element nilpotent.
Sometimes a semi-group
with proper left ideals may have a largest such ideal
(that is, containing all other proper left ideals). This, for example, is the case when
has a right identity. In that case, if
is not a singleton, then it is a sub-semi-group. In a periodic semi-group
the existence of
implies that
is a (largest proper) two-sided ideal. Another example is
given by subgroups with separating group part (see
Invertible element)
which is not a group.
References| [1a] |
S. Schwarz,
"On maximal ideals in the theory of semigroups I"
Czechoslovak. Math. J.
, 3
(1953)
pp. 139–153
(In Russian)
(English abstract) | | [1b] |
S. Schwarz,
"On maximal ideals in the theory of semigroups II"
Czechoslovak. Math. J.
, 4
(1953)
pp. 365–383
(In Russian)
(English abstract) | | [2] |
S. Schwarz,
"Prime ideals and maximal ideals in semigroups"
Czechoslovak. Math. J.
, 19
(1969)
pp. 72–79 | | [3] |
P.A. Grillet,
"Intersections of maximal ideals in semigroups"
Amer. Math. Monthly
, 76
(1969)
pp. 503–509 |
L.N. Shevrin
This text originally appeared in Encyclopaedia of Mathematics
- ISBN 1402006098
|