A method of proof used by mathematicians of antiquity in order
to determine areas and volumes. The name
"method of exhaustion"
was introduced in the
17th century.
The typical scheme of proof by the method of exhaustion can, in
modern terms, be explained as follows. In order to determine a quantity
one constructs a certain sequence of quantities
such that
one assumes that a

is known such that
and that for any integer

and all sufficiently large

the inequalities
are fulfilled, with

a constant. From the modern point of view, to transfer
(3)
to
one only has to notice that
(1)–
(3)
imply
The mathematicians of antiquity, not having developed the theory of limits (cf.
Limit),
used a
reductio ad absurdum
argument here: they proved that neither of the inequalities

,

is possible. To disprove the first one, they established by the
Archimedean axiom
that for

there exists a

such that

,
and
(1)
then led to
which contradicts the second inequality in
(3).
The other assertion
is disproved in a similar way. Hence
(4)
remains.
The introduction of the method of exhaustion and of the axiom that
lies at its foundation is ascribed to
Eudoxus
of Cnidus. The method was extensively used by Eudoxus, while
Archimedes
used it with
extraordinary skill and variety. E.g., in order to determine the area
of a segment of a parabola,
Archimedes
constructs the areas
of segments that are stepwise
"exhausting"
the area
.
Here
Instead of the limit transition
Archimedes
proves geometrically that for any

,
Introducing the area
he obtains
and, following the reasoning explained above, finishes his proof with